3 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
shenjackanddeepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 a7b988b417 Name the 1.1.0 update 1.1.0 instead of 1.1.1
The update this port builds for has version value 0x20000, which is Tears of the Kingdom 1.1.0, not 1.1.1: the upstream expected-v1.1.2.json carries 0x40000 and the other expected files step 0x10000 per release, so 0x20000 is 1.1.0 and 0x30000 is 1.1.1. Pull request #220 introduced the wrong label in expected-v1.1.1.json.

Expected hashes, patch sites, boot constants and the RomFS layout are unchanged; only names change:
- tools/data/expected-v1.1.1.json -> expected-v1.1.0.json, display_version 1.1.0
- recomp/patches-v111.txt -> patches-v110.txt
- installer/layout.py SUPPORTED and tools/build_game.py DISPLAY_VERSIONS
- make_romfs_patches.py --version choices and its COMMON table key (the RomFS archive name stays Common.Product.110)
- runtime RT_V111 -> RT_V110, the inits_111 and expect_111 tables, the probe's census folder v110
- README, docs and the installer texts

Co-authored-by: deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 <noreply@deepseek.com>
2026-11-01 21:08:13 +08:00
shenjackanddeepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 93eeb8b29f Record the expected hashes of the 1.1 update
The ExeFS digests, the merged RomFS size and hash and the six shared fonts, so extract.py can tell this update from any
other. No rewritten_sha256: that field names MacNativeGames' NSO rewriter output, this dump never went through it, and
nothing reads it.

Co-authored-by: deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017 <noreply@deepseek.com>
2026-11-01 01:49:38 +08:00
Valiantsin DzerakhandClaude Opus 5.5 19c9b648d1 Add the recompiler, Windows runtime, tools and docs
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-23 22:27:54 +03:00